West Montrose Covered Bridge Rehabilitation - Woolwich

Share West Montrose Covered Bridge Rehabilitation - Woolwich on Facebook Share West Montrose Covered Bridge Rehabilitation - Woolwich on Twitter Share West Montrose Covered Bridge Rehabilitation - Woolwich on Linkedin Email West Montrose Covered Bridge Rehabilitation - Woolwich link

This project supports the Region of Waterloo's strategic focus area(s):

West Montrose Bridge in Woolwich

The Region of Waterloo is looking to rehabilitate the West Montrose Covered Bridge in the Township of Woolwich through a major structural upgrade.

The project will follow a Schedule “C" Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, and stems from long-term monitoring and evaluation of the load-carrying capacity of the bridge.

A detailed inspection and evaluation of the timber truss was undertaken and recommendations were provided for the timber truss elements that require replacement due to deteriorated conditions. Six rehabilitation alternatives were reviewed against a set of evaluation criteria including heritage, structural, social environment and cost criteria to recommend the preferred alternative.

Recommended Design Concept
The Recommended Design Concept includes removal of the existing steel Bailey trusses, replacement of deteriorated wooden truss members and bridge elements, and reinforcing select members to accommodate a 10-tonne design vehicular live load. The three-tonne posted load limit will be maintained. To prevent oversized vehicles from accessing and damaging the bridge, an overhead height restriction bar is proposed on the north approach of the bridge and narrowing the road is proposed on the south approach.

The recommended design concept proposes the following:

  1. Reducing the existing sag on the bridge
  2. Replacing the roof with new cedar shingles
  3. Replacing the red exterior wooden cladding
  4. Replacing the window louvres
  5. Removing the existing steel Bailey truss
  6. Reinstating the tar and chip wearing surface after replacement of the nail-laminated deck
  7. Replacing the steel hanger rods inside the bridge
  8. Replacing the roof rafters as necessary
  9. Replacing the tie beams, as necessary
  10. Replacing the wooden curbs
  11. Replacing the interior light bulbs, as necessary
  12. Replacing the needle beams with new 16” x 16” Douglas fir beams
  13. Replacing the floor beams with new 16” x 16” Douglas fir beams
  14. Stone mortar repairs and placement of scour protection at the bridge pier
  15. Replacing the external sway bracing
  16. Replacing the stringers with new sawn wood stringers
  17. Replacing the existing nail-laminated wooden deck
  18. Removing the Bailey truss hanger system
  19. Removing the non-functioning tension rods (1959)
  20. Replacing the bottom lateral bracing
  21. Replacing the bottom chords with new Douglas Fir chords
  22. Repairing the concrete at the bridge abutments
  23. Keeping the same bridge deck elevation and approach grades
  24. Adding a height restriction bar to prevent heavy vehicles from using the bridge
  25. Using fire retardant materials on the timber truss elements and exterior cladding
  26. Replacing the end diagonals at the pier and strengthening of the end diagonals at the abutments
  27. Adding new overhead wood lateral bracing
  28. Adding a new timber guiderail
  29. Reinforcing the top chord with the lower top chord
  30. Removing the interior cladding and reinstatement in short sections at each end of the bridge

Items #1 to #25 are common to all of the alternatives that were considered. Items #26 to #30 are specific to the Preferred Alternative C2 – wooden truss repairs to a 10 tonne load limit.

The Recommended Design Concept was approved by Regional Council on February 21, 2024. Review the staff report.

The recommended design was the outcome of the technical studies conducted, a detailed alternatives assessment based on a set of evaluation criteria, and public input from three rounds of public engagement in October 2021, June 2022, and November 2023.

The recommended design addresses public concerns we heard such as the need for replacement truss members to be entirely with new wood members. The project team also revised the recommended design to include narrowing the road on the south approach of the bridge by moving the wooden guiderails closer to each other to eliminate the need for the height restriction bar on the south approach.

Based on the public feedback received, the project team is not recommending a restriction of all motorized vehicles on the bridge at this time.

The Environmental Study Report for this Schedule ‘C’ Class Environmental Assessment will be filed for a 30-day review period in Spring 2024. Construction is expected to start in 2025 and be completed in 2026.

Documents

The Preferred Alternative renderings can be found under the Public Consultation #3 folder to the right. A summary of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) and responses to comments received during the public consultation can be found on the right.

This project supports the Region of Waterloo's strategic focus area(s):

West Montrose Bridge in Woolwich

The Region of Waterloo is looking to rehabilitate the West Montrose Covered Bridge in the Township of Woolwich through a major structural upgrade.

The project will follow a Schedule “C" Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, and stems from long-term monitoring and evaluation of the load-carrying capacity of the bridge.

A detailed inspection and evaluation of the timber truss was undertaken and recommendations were provided for the timber truss elements that require replacement due to deteriorated conditions. Six rehabilitation alternatives were reviewed against a set of evaluation criteria including heritage, structural, social environment and cost criteria to recommend the preferred alternative.

Recommended Design Concept
The Recommended Design Concept includes removal of the existing steel Bailey trusses, replacement of deteriorated wooden truss members and bridge elements, and reinforcing select members to accommodate a 10-tonne design vehicular live load. The three-tonne posted load limit will be maintained. To prevent oversized vehicles from accessing and damaging the bridge, an overhead height restriction bar is proposed on the north approach of the bridge and narrowing the road is proposed on the south approach.

The recommended design concept proposes the following:

  1. Reducing the existing sag on the bridge
  2. Replacing the roof with new cedar shingles
  3. Replacing the red exterior wooden cladding
  4. Replacing the window louvres
  5. Removing the existing steel Bailey truss
  6. Reinstating the tar and chip wearing surface after replacement of the nail-laminated deck
  7. Replacing the steel hanger rods inside the bridge
  8. Replacing the roof rafters as necessary
  9. Replacing the tie beams, as necessary
  10. Replacing the wooden curbs
  11. Replacing the interior light bulbs, as necessary
  12. Replacing the needle beams with new 16” x 16” Douglas fir beams
  13. Replacing the floor beams with new 16” x 16” Douglas fir beams
  14. Stone mortar repairs and placement of scour protection at the bridge pier
  15. Replacing the external sway bracing
  16. Replacing the stringers with new sawn wood stringers
  17. Replacing the existing nail-laminated wooden deck
  18. Removing the Bailey truss hanger system
  19. Removing the non-functioning tension rods (1959)
  20. Replacing the bottom lateral bracing
  21. Replacing the bottom chords with new Douglas Fir chords
  22. Repairing the concrete at the bridge abutments
  23. Keeping the same bridge deck elevation and approach grades
  24. Adding a height restriction bar to prevent heavy vehicles from using the bridge
  25. Using fire retardant materials on the timber truss elements and exterior cladding
  26. Replacing the end diagonals at the pier and strengthening of the end diagonals at the abutments
  27. Adding new overhead wood lateral bracing
  28. Adding a new timber guiderail
  29. Reinforcing the top chord with the lower top chord
  30. Removing the interior cladding and reinstatement in short sections at each end of the bridge

Items #1 to #25 are common to all of the alternatives that were considered. Items #26 to #30 are specific to the Preferred Alternative C2 – wooden truss repairs to a 10 tonne load limit.

The Recommended Design Concept was approved by Regional Council on February 21, 2024. Review the staff report.

The recommended design was the outcome of the technical studies conducted, a detailed alternatives assessment based on a set of evaluation criteria, and public input from three rounds of public engagement in October 2021, June 2022, and November 2023.

The recommended design addresses public concerns we heard such as the need for replacement truss members to be entirely with new wood members. The project team also revised the recommended design to include narrowing the road on the south approach of the bridge by moving the wooden guiderails closer to each other to eliminate the need for the height restriction bar on the south approach.

Based on the public feedback received, the project team is not recommending a restriction of all motorized vehicles on the bridge at this time.

The Environmental Study Report for this Schedule ‘C’ Class Environmental Assessment will be filed for a 30-day review period in Spring 2024. Construction is expected to start in 2025 and be completed in 2026.

Documents

The Preferred Alternative renderings can be found under the Public Consultation #3 folder to the right. A summary of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) and responses to comments received during the public consultation can be found on the right.

  • CLOSED: This survey has concluded.

    Please complete the survey by December 13, 2023

    Share Public Consultation #3 Survey - November 2023 on Facebook Share Public Consultation #3 Survey - November 2023 on Twitter Share Public Consultation #3 Survey - November 2023 on Linkedin Email Public Consultation #3 Survey - November 2023 link
  • CLOSED: This survey has concluded.

    October 2021

    Share Public Consultation #1 Survey on Facebook Share Public Consultation #1 Survey on Twitter Share Public Consultation #1 Survey on Linkedin Email Public Consultation #1 Survey link
  • CLOSED: This survey has concluded.

    June 2022

    Share Public Consultation #2 Survey on Facebook Share Public Consultation #2 Survey on Twitter Share Public Consultation #2 Survey on Linkedin Email Public Consultation #2 Survey link
Page last updated: 01 Nov 2024, 10:59 AM