Vision Zero
Traffic collisions are not accidents.
When councillors and staff talk to Kitchener residents, one of the most common issues raised are concerns about speeding and road safety. We want to make roads, sidewalks and trails in Kitchener safer for all ages, abilities and modes of transportation.
Vision Zero is a new way of thinking about creating safer roads. Our vision is to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries to zero. This concept started in Sweden in 1997 and has become popular around the world.
Here’s how Vision Zero strategies approach road safety:
- focus on reducing fatal and serious injury collisions
- collisions are preventable and no preventable loss of life is acceptable
- human mistakes and errors should be expected and anticipated
- our transportation network should be designed to account for human mistakes and errors
- road safety is a shared responsibility among the people who design, maintain, enforce rules on and use roads and intersections
- proactively address issues before collisions
Our Vision Zero strategy offers guidance on building and designing roads, supporting law enforcement, educating and engaging the public, and finding solutions to the specific concerns in our neighbourhoods.
Vision Zero dashboard
Visit our Vision Zero dashboard to find collision statistics and our progress on Vision Zero.
Stay Informed
To get updates about this project, add your email to the ’Stay Informed’ box and click ‘Subscribe’.
Traffic collisions are not accidents.
When councillors and staff talk to Kitchener residents, one of the most common issues raised are concerns about speeding and road safety. We want to make roads, sidewalks and trails in Kitchener safer for all ages, abilities and modes of transportation.
Vision Zero is a new way of thinking about creating safer roads. Our vision is to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries to zero. This concept started in Sweden in 1997 and has become popular around the world.
Here’s how Vision Zero strategies approach road safety:
- focus on reducing fatal and serious injury collisions
- collisions are preventable and no preventable loss of life is acceptable
- human mistakes and errors should be expected and anticipated
- our transportation network should be designed to account for human mistakes and errors
- road safety is a shared responsibility among the people who design, maintain, enforce rules on and use roads and intersections
- proactively address issues before collisions
Our Vision Zero strategy offers guidance on building and designing roads, supporting law enforcement, educating and engaging the public, and finding solutions to the specific concerns in our neighbourhoods.
Vision Zero dashboard
Visit our Vision Zero dashboard to find collision statistics and our progress on Vision Zero.
Stay Informed
To get updates about this project, add your email to the ’Stay Informed’ box and click ‘Subscribe’.
Ask a question
Do you have a question about Vision Zero? Ask it here.
To protect your privacy:
- Do not include your last name in your username
- Do not include any personal information (like your address) in your question
Before submitting your question, please make sure it meets our etiquette and moderation policy. If it doesn’t, we will not be able to respond.
If your question is urgent, call the City of Kitchener at 519-741-2345 (TTY: 1-866-969-9994)
-
Share There's quite a mix of different bike lane ideas converging together in multiple intersection in the city (Eg. Queen & Joseph). Has public feedback been considered as to what is working and what has not? What works on paper doesn't always translate well to real life. on Facebook Share There's quite a mix of different bike lane ideas converging together in multiple intersection in the city (Eg. Queen & Joseph). Has public feedback been considered as to what is working and what has not? What works on paper doesn't always translate well to real life. on Twitter Share There's quite a mix of different bike lane ideas converging together in multiple intersection in the city (Eg. Queen & Joseph). Has public feedback been considered as to what is working and what has not? What works on paper doesn't always translate well to real life. on Linkedin Email There's quite a mix of different bike lane ideas converging together in multiple intersection in the city (Eg. Queen & Joseph). Has public feedback been considered as to what is working and what has not? What works on paper doesn't always translate well to real life. link
There's quite a mix of different bike lane ideas converging together in multiple intersection in the city (Eg. Queen & Joseph). Has public feedback been considered as to what is working and what has not? What works on paper doesn't always translate well to real life.
JS_84 asked 8 months agoThere are many ways to provide feedback on cycling infrastructure design. The Active Transportation & Trails Advisory Committee provides regular input to staff on walking, rolling and cycling projects and policies. You can also subscribe to the Bike Kitchener newsletter for consultation opportunities, or contact city staff anytime at cycling@kitchener.ca.
In regards to your specific example, we are standardizing intersection design through our Complete Streets Guidelines. We commissioned a 3rd party consultant to do an independent safety review of the Downtown Cycling Grid, which includes the Joseph St and Queen St intersection. There are some improvements that will be made in the short-term, and in the long-term, when opportunities arise, we will consider further improvements to bring it closer to a typical protected intersection.
-
Share Why are multi-use paths being built in place of separated bike lanes and wider sidewalks? I understand that sometimes the space required for both is not available, but in others it seems to be only about 2-for-1 convenience (that really functions as just a wide sidewalk). Pedestrians and cyclists can still have plenty of conflicts, even if the injuries as a result are less significant. Further, it is inconsistent for vehicles - are the cyclists on a road, the sidewalk or a path? Please reconsider the use of these in place of dedicated space for the different users. A cyclist going fast near a pedestrian is dangerous and startling. People walking in groups or with toddlers or dogs on a leash across a multi-use path is dangerous for cyclists trying to pass safely. A multi-use path should not be the default. on Facebook Share Why are multi-use paths being built in place of separated bike lanes and wider sidewalks? I understand that sometimes the space required for both is not available, but in others it seems to be only about 2-for-1 convenience (that really functions as just a wide sidewalk). Pedestrians and cyclists can still have plenty of conflicts, even if the injuries as a result are less significant. Further, it is inconsistent for vehicles - are the cyclists on a road, the sidewalk or a path? Please reconsider the use of these in place of dedicated space for the different users. A cyclist going fast near a pedestrian is dangerous and startling. People walking in groups or with toddlers or dogs on a leash across a multi-use path is dangerous for cyclists trying to pass safely. A multi-use path should not be the default. on Twitter Share Why are multi-use paths being built in place of separated bike lanes and wider sidewalks? I understand that sometimes the space required for both is not available, but in others it seems to be only about 2-for-1 convenience (that really functions as just a wide sidewalk). Pedestrians and cyclists can still have plenty of conflicts, even if the injuries as a result are less significant. Further, it is inconsistent for vehicles - are the cyclists on a road, the sidewalk or a path? Please reconsider the use of these in place of dedicated space for the different users. A cyclist going fast near a pedestrian is dangerous and startling. People walking in groups or with toddlers or dogs on a leash across a multi-use path is dangerous for cyclists trying to pass safely. A multi-use path should not be the default. on Linkedin Email Why are multi-use paths being built in place of separated bike lanes and wider sidewalks? I understand that sometimes the space required for both is not available, but in others it seems to be only about 2-for-1 convenience (that really functions as just a wide sidewalk). Pedestrians and cyclists can still have plenty of conflicts, even if the injuries as a result are less significant. Further, it is inconsistent for vehicles - are the cyclists on a road, the sidewalk or a path? Please reconsider the use of these in place of dedicated space for the different users. A cyclist going fast near a pedestrian is dangerous and startling. People walking in groups or with toddlers or dogs on a leash across a multi-use path is dangerous for cyclists trying to pass safely. A multi-use path should not be the default. link
Why are multi-use paths being built in place of separated bike lanes and wider sidewalks? I understand that sometimes the space required for both is not available, but in others it seems to be only about 2-for-1 convenience (that really functions as just a wide sidewalk). Pedestrians and cyclists can still have plenty of conflicts, even if the injuries as a result are less significant. Further, it is inconsistent for vehicles - are the cyclists on a road, the sidewalk or a path? Please reconsider the use of these in place of dedicated space for the different users. A cyclist going fast near a pedestrian is dangerous and startling. People walking in groups or with toddlers or dogs on a leash across a multi-use path is dangerous for cyclists trying to pass safely. A multi-use path should not be the default.
AverageJoe asked 5 months agoThank you for sharing your thoughts on multi-use trails (MUTs). The City’s Complete Streets Guidelines identify distinct cycle tracks and sidewalks as the preferred infrastructure type in our street reconstructions. This helps to reduce conflicts between pedestrians and cyclists. You can see a recent example of this treatment on Highland Road between Queen’s Boulevard and Stirling Avenue. Most reconstructions will utilize this standard, unless there are specific constraints that require an alternative approach. Multi-use trails are often selected because they optimize the use of limited space and are more cost-effective than constructing separate bike lanes and wide sidewalks. MUTs also offer flexibility by accommodating a variety of users, including pedestrians and cyclists, especially in areas where the total volume of trail users is expected to be low. We understand your safety concerns and are actively exploring ways to improve path design. This includes enhancing signage and pavement markings, as well as engaging the public to ensure MUTs are safe and enjoyable for everyone.
-
Share Do you have a cost comparison on the injuries in terms of metrics or just occurrence s on Facebook Share Do you have a cost comparison on the injuries in terms of metrics or just occurrence s on Twitter Share Do you have a cost comparison on the injuries in terms of metrics or just occurrence s on Linkedin Email Do you have a cost comparison on the injuries in terms of metrics or just occurrence s link
Do you have a cost comparison on the injuries in terms of metrics or just occurrence s
JoLogicCommonSense asked almost 2 years agoTo assess and compare the financial impact of injuries, both tangible and intangible metrics are taken into account. Tangible costs encompass medical bills and lost earnings, while intangible costs relate to aspects like pain and emotional distress. When considering occurrences, the frequency or number of injury incidents is factored into the cost estimation. The values of statistical life per casualty type can be found at https://tc.canada.ca/en/road-transportation/statistics-data/statistics-data-road-safety/2020-statistics-social-costs-collisions-canada.
-
Share you have a list of bicycle injuries (chart) can you relate this to where they happened, bike lanes, traffic lights, road ways, roundabouts, etc. on Facebook Share you have a list of bicycle injuries (chart) can you relate this to where they happened, bike lanes, traffic lights, road ways, roundabouts, etc. on Twitter Share you have a list of bicycle injuries (chart) can you relate this to where they happened, bike lanes, traffic lights, road ways, roundabouts, etc. on Linkedin Email you have a list of bicycle injuries (chart) can you relate this to where they happened, bike lanes, traffic lights, road ways, roundabouts, etc. link
you have a list of bicycle injuries (chart) can you relate this to where they happened, bike lanes, traffic lights, road ways, roundabouts, etc.
ward asked almost 2 years agoThe collision data report provides specific details about the location of each incident. This data can be used to associate each collision with its context, such as bike lanes, traffic lights, roundabouts, etc. This information is publicly accessible in the 'collisions' section of Kitchener’s open data repository. The collision data can be found here.
-
Share Who is at fault in these accidents? Why does it always look as if the vehicle driver is at fault? Cyclists not following the laws and pedestrians not paying attention as they walk out on a road. Yes, drivers need to be aware and attentive but cyclists and pedestrians also need to be doing the same. on Facebook Share Who is at fault in these accidents? Why does it always look as if the vehicle driver is at fault? Cyclists not following the laws and pedestrians not paying attention as they walk out on a road. Yes, drivers need to be aware and attentive but cyclists and pedestrians also need to be doing the same. on Twitter Share Who is at fault in these accidents? Why does it always look as if the vehicle driver is at fault? Cyclists not following the laws and pedestrians not paying attention as they walk out on a road. Yes, drivers need to be aware and attentive but cyclists and pedestrians also need to be doing the same. on Linkedin Email Who is at fault in these accidents? Why does it always look as if the vehicle driver is at fault? Cyclists not following the laws and pedestrians not paying attention as they walk out on a road. Yes, drivers need to be aware and attentive but cyclists and pedestrians also need to be doing the same. link
Who is at fault in these accidents? Why does it always look as if the vehicle driver is at fault? Cyclists not following the laws and pedestrians not paying attention as they walk out on a road. Yes, drivers need to be aware and attentive but cyclists and pedestrians also need to be doing the same.
tonyst asked almost 2 years agoEach collision must be evaluated individually to determine the cause. The result of this evaluation can lead to safety improvements and initiatives under the Vision Zero Strategy. While Vision Zero emphasizes all street users have an important role to play for safety, its primary objective is to eliminate collisions leading to serious injuries or fatalities. If any street user makes a mistake, the system should be designed to anticipate and minimize the impact.
-
Share We know that the way we build roads in North America is deadly. Why are we continuing to design and build our roads the same as always, with wide travel lanes, right turns on red lights still permitted, slip lanes still permitted, no pedestrian refuge islands, no smart signalling, no continuous sidewalks, barely any separated bike lanes, and on and on and on. These should all be required in our design standards, and implemented in every new development, and every time we repair or replace roadway. How else will be make durable progress towards safe streets? on Facebook Share We know that the way we build roads in North America is deadly. Why are we continuing to design and build our roads the same as always, with wide travel lanes, right turns on red lights still permitted, slip lanes still permitted, no pedestrian refuge islands, no smart signalling, no continuous sidewalks, barely any separated bike lanes, and on and on and on. These should all be required in our design standards, and implemented in every new development, and every time we repair or replace roadway. How else will be make durable progress towards safe streets? on Twitter Share We know that the way we build roads in North America is deadly. Why are we continuing to design and build our roads the same as always, with wide travel lanes, right turns on red lights still permitted, slip lanes still permitted, no pedestrian refuge islands, no smart signalling, no continuous sidewalks, barely any separated bike lanes, and on and on and on. These should all be required in our design standards, and implemented in every new development, and every time we repair or replace roadway. How else will be make durable progress towards safe streets? on Linkedin Email We know that the way we build roads in North America is deadly. Why are we continuing to design and build our roads the same as always, with wide travel lanes, right turns on red lights still permitted, slip lanes still permitted, no pedestrian refuge islands, no smart signalling, no continuous sidewalks, barely any separated bike lanes, and on and on and on. These should all be required in our design standards, and implemented in every new development, and every time we repair or replace roadway. How else will be make durable progress towards safe streets? link
We know that the way we build roads in North America is deadly. Why are we continuing to design and build our roads the same as always, with wide travel lanes, right turns on red lights still permitted, slip lanes still permitted, no pedestrian refuge islands, no smart signalling, no continuous sidewalks, barely any separated bike lanes, and on and on and on. These should all be required in our design standards, and implemented in every new development, and every time we repair or replace roadway. How else will be make durable progress towards safe streets?
mikedoherty asked over 1 year agoThe City of Kitchener adopted Complete Streets design standard in 2019. The City of Kitchener’s Complete Streets Guidelines can be found here. These guidelines include new design standards for all streets being constructed through new development or City-led reconstruction projects. Complete Streets design standards were developed using industry best practices and extensive stakeholder engagement.
Follow Project
Lifecycle
-
Survey open
Vision Zero has finished this stageThis consultation is open for contributions.
-
Closed for review
Vision Zero has finished this stageContributions to this consultation are closed for evaluation and review.
-
Consultation on draft action items
Vision Zero has finished this stageSurvey is open for feedback on the draft action items.
-
Final report
Vision Zero has finished this stageSurvey is closed. The final report will be presented to Council by the end of 2021.
-
Vision Zero
Vision Zero is currently at this stageThe 4-year Vision Zero strategy was approved by Council and is now underway.
We will continue to use this page to keep you informed about the strategy. Please subscribe for updates.
Videos
- Speeding doesn’t get you there any faster. We’re working to eliminate serious injuries and fatalities caused by traffic collisions.
- Learn about pedestrian crossovers – places where pedestrians have the right of way. We’re working to eliminate serious injuries and fatalities caused by traffic collisions.
- Traffic collisions are not accidents. They always have a cause, which means they can be prevented. We all have a role to play in making Kitchener a Vision Zero community.
- Traffic collisions are not accidents. They can be prevented. This video is the first in a series of three developed to promote awareness of the strategy and improve driving behaviour.
Important Links
FAQs
-
Vision Zero FAQ
- What is Vision Zero?
- How is Vision Zero different from traditional road safety approaches?
- Isn’t it impossible to prevent all serious injuries and fatalities on the road?
- How can Vision Zero reduce the number of traffic related serious injuries and deaths?
- What changes should we expect on streets as a result of this project?
- How do you decide where to install road safety improvements?
- How do other City safety programs fit into the Vision Zero Strategy?
- Who are you working with on this plan?
- Why does Vision Zero focus on active modes of transportation (walking and cycling)?
- Will Vision Zero make it hard to get around the city?
- How can I get involved/stay updated?
Who's Listening
-
Phone 519-741-2345 Email faranak.hosseini@kitchener.ca