Preston Springs
The private property on 102 Fountain Street South, known fondly as the Preston Springs Hotel, had been boarded up and vacant for 30 years.
The City has endeavoured to work with several owners and proposals to restore the troubled building but finding a solution has proved complicated and cost-prohibitive.
Over the course of that time, there have been significant issues in terms of vandalism, safety, trespassing, and keeping the building secured. These problems have further contributed to the condition of the property which was in an advanced state of deterioration and structural decay.
Cambridge is a city rich with history and architecture and it is always the City’s preference to work with private owners to preserve our past and to respect heritage designations.
However, the Chief Building Official felt there was no other option but to issue an Emergency Order to demolish the building in the interest of public safety in December, 2020.
While much of the heritage value had been lost over the years, certain items were salvaged during the demolition.
On January 28, 2021, Council asked staff to report back on 11 options that will further enhance and strengthen heritage protection and conservation practices in the City of Cambridge. Watch the full council meeting here.
As well, Council voted to release a report that was discussed during a closed council session on January 21, 2020. This report and other related materials will be updated in the Documents section on this page.
On this page, you will also find history and background information on the property. Frequently Asked Questions will also be updated.
The private property on 102 Fountain Street South, known fondly as the Preston Springs Hotel, had been boarded up and vacant for 30 years.
The City has endeavoured to work with several owners and proposals to restore the troubled building but finding a solution has proved complicated and cost-prohibitive.
Over the course of that time, there have been significant issues in terms of vandalism, safety, trespassing, and keeping the building secured. These problems have further contributed to the condition of the property which was in an advanced state of deterioration and structural decay.
Cambridge is a city rich with history and architecture and it is always the City’s preference to work with private owners to preserve our past and to respect heritage designations.
However, the Chief Building Official felt there was no other option but to issue an Emergency Order to demolish the building in the interest of public safety in December, 2020.
While much of the heritage value had been lost over the years, certain items were salvaged during the demolition.
On January 28, 2021, Council asked staff to report back on 11 options that will further enhance and strengthen heritage protection and conservation practices in the City of Cambridge. Watch the full council meeting here.
As well, Council voted to release a report that was discussed during a closed council session on January 21, 2020. This report and other related materials will be updated in the Documents section on this page.
On this page, you will also find history and background information on the property. Frequently Asked Questions will also be updated.
-
History: Pre-1990
Share History: Pre-1990 on Facebook Share History: Pre-1990 on Twitter Share History: Pre-1990 on Linkedin Email History: Pre-1990 linkThe site was first purchased by Henry Walder in 1877. He passed away in 1888 and the site was inherited by his son Robert Walder.
After visiting the famous Del Monte Hotel in California, Robert Walder decided to bring both the name and architectural style to Preston. He combined the inspiration of the hotel with the mineral springs and built a lavish tourist resort.
It featured a grand staircase leading to three upper floors and was located on five acres of terraced gardens and orchards. At the beginning of the twentieth century, the hotel doubled in size with the building extending south along Fountain Street. The primary attraction was the mineral baths in the basement. The high sulphur content was believed to cleanse the body and treat arthritis and rheumatism.
A competing facility next door, the Sulphur Springs Hotel, opened in the mid- 1890s, and a nearby hotel, the North American (renamed the Kress Hotel in 1900), opened in 1840.
In the early 1920’s the hotel was purchased by Drs. J. Edwin and Gordon Hagmeier, two brothers who had graduated in medicine from the University of Toronto. They operated the building both as a hotel and as a private sanitarium and clinic. With the arrival of the Hagmeiers, the hotel came to be known as the Preston Springs Hotel and operated until the early 1940s.
In 1943, the property was taken over by A. R. Kaufman who almost immediately turned the building over to the federal government to be used to house some to the naval trainees at the Women’s Royal Canadian Naval Training Establishment (HMCS Conestoga) in Galt.
It eventually it become a retirement and care facility, until closing in 1990, when the building was boarded up and left vacant.
The property at 102 Fountain Street South was designated under the Ontario Heritage Act for its architectural, historical and contextual significance.
Reference: A Part of Our Past by Jim Quantrell
-
History: Since 1990
Share History: Since 1990 on Facebook Share History: Since 1990 on Twitter Share History: Since 1990 on Linkedin Email History: Since 1990 linkThe Preston Springs property has been a community landmark with a long and storied history. Since it was left vacant in 1990, different owners and potential proposals have come and gone over the years. It had always been the City’s hope that a viable solution would be found to rehabilitate the building and to bring it back to life.
In July 1997, a grant from the Heritage Conservation Fund was approved by Council of $100,000 to assist the then-owner with restoration and his vision.
Over the years, different Councils have expressed concern about the security and future plans of the hotel, touring the building, requesting updates and meeting with ownership groups to encourage a plan forward. The property was purchased by the current owner Haastown Holdings in 2013.
In an effort to encourage development, the City waived all planning application fees, including development charges and building permits, since the 1990s. And, as recently as 2018, Council approved a working group comprised of councillors in an attempt to work with the current owner to investigate the possibility of turning Preston Springs into affordable housing.
The property has been extremely challenging and there have been significant issues with the building relating to the roof, electrical, structural condition and mould dating back to the early 1990s.
There have also been ongoing concerns reported by the public, police and fire officials, ranging from fires, trespassing, camping, vandalism, graffiti, broken windows, drug debris, and garbage.
The location, history and abandonment of the hotel has attracted vandals, scavengers, graffiti artists, urban explorers, video crews, and those seeking shelter.
The City has made significant efforts over the years to enforce lot maintenance, building security and minimum maintenance standards under the Building Code Act. There have been numerous complaints to bylaw staff, with subsequent inspections and compliance orders issued. These efforts have often been hindered by vandalism and trespassing that has taken place over the years.
Recent engineering reports raised the following specific concerns:
- Numerous openings in floors, unguarded stairs, and elevator shaft.
- The west end of the basement was essentially an open excavation.
- The floor of the entire west addition was structurally unstable and not capable of supporting occupants. The potential for someone to fall through was high given that the main area central corridor lead to this area.
- The original west mutli-wythe masonry brick wall was in a state of collapse.
- The balconies were in advanced state of deterioration with loose guard rails.
- The interior structure remained exposed to the exterior elements and was deteriorating rapidly.
- The building posed a hazard to unauthorized occupants and the building was in possible danger of further structural failure.
- The rate of deterioration of the brick and concrete components increases significantly during freeze-thaw cycles.
Please see overview of Council meetings and directions here.
Engineering Reports
Council Reports
-
Heritage Salvage Plan
Share Heritage Salvage Plan on Facebook Share Heritage Salvage Plan on Twitter Share Heritage Salvage Plan on Linkedin Email Heritage Salvage Plan linkThe plan was completed by a firm that specializes in heritage conservation. Their heritage team reviewed the building to create a historic record and provided direction as to which items should be saved for historical significance, this included:
- Entry fountain
- Entry door
- Lobby fireplace
- Select millwork, doors
As well, the demolition contractor, with experience in cultural heritage demolition, also retrieved stonework around the fireplace, window trim, the bannisters from the main lobby staircase, stone wall, pilaster at the front entrance, and mosaic tile.
The tower was not part of the original structure – it was a replica constructed around 1999.
This is a private property and the owner owns these elements. However, the City will be working with the owner to find options to preserve these pieces.
Read the Documentation and Salvage Plan.
Historical photos
Heritage salvage photos
Documents
-
Council Reports/Staff Presentations/Minutes
- Meeting Agenda and Reports - January 28, 2021
- Preston Springs Presentation - January 28, 2020
- Preston Springs Council Report - January 21 2020.pdf (226 KB) (pdf)
- Preston Springs Council Report - May 29 2018 (338 KB) (pdf)
- Council Minutes - November 12, 2012 (32.8 MB) (pdf)
- Council Minutes - October 22, 2012 (72.9 KB) (pdf)
- Economic Development Advisory Minutes - September 12, 2001 (29.7 KB) (pdf)
- Cambridge L.A.C.A.C 1997 Annual Report and 1998 Work Plan - November 1997 (2.62 MB) (pdf)
- Plan & Dev Minutes - November 17, 1997 (45 MB) (pdf)
- Council Minutes - July 14, 1997 (137 MB) (pdf)
- Plan & Dev Minutes - July 7, 1997 (78.3 MB) (pdf)
- Preston Springs - Grant Report and PD Minutes - July 7, 1997 (1.82 MB) (pdf)
- Grant from the Heritage Conservation Fund 102 Fountain Street - July 1997 (967 KB) (pdf)
- Council Minutes - June 24, 1996 (103 MB) (pdf)
- Cambridge Mills District Study - November 1990 (30.7 MB) (pdf)
- Plan & Dev Minutes - November 19, 1990 (171 MB) (pdf)
- Plan & Dev Minutes - November 5, 1990 (115 MB) (pdf)
- Implementation of Cambridge Mills Study - November 1990 (5.7 MB) (pdf)
-
Engineering and Information Reports
- Engineering Report - December 2019 - SBM (3.34 MB) (pdf)
- Engineering Report - January 13 2020 - IRC (1.45 MB) (pdf)
- Engineering Report - November 19 2020 - SBM (852 KB) (pdf)
- Engineering Report - November 19 2020 - IRC (110 KB) (pdf)
- Information Report - January 12, 2011 - Item 3 (448 KB) (pdf)
- Information Report - November 8, 2000 - Item 3, Additional Items 1 (3.97 MB) (pdf)
- Status Report - Preston Springs Gardens – 102 Fountain Street - November 2000 (29.3 KB) (pdf)
- Planning Report to LACAC - Sept 16, 1999 (450 KB) (pdf)
- Planning Report to LACAC - Aug 3, 1999 (339 KB) (pdf)
- Planning Report to LACAC - July 7, 1999 (692 KB) (pdf)
- Planning Report to LACAC - Dec 15, 1994 (2.09 MB) (pdf)
- News Releases
- Other Materials
Help grow the archive
Do you have any photos of Preston Springs that you'd like added to the archive? Help us grow our Preston Springs collection by sharing your photos or documents.
Submit a question
Have a question? Submit here
FAQs
- When will demolition wrap up?
- What will happen to the sulfur springs underneath?
- How was the public informed?
- Who is paying for the cost of the demo?
- Has there been a formal proposal submitted to the City to develop the site?
- What independent authority does the Chief Building Official have?
- How do complaints about issues on properties currently get actioned and resolved?
2020 Timeline
-
January 22
Preston Springs has finished this stageThe Chief Building Official (CBO) issued an unsafe order on the property in the interest of public safety.
- This order directed the owner to obtain a demolition permit, comply with the Ontario Heritage Act, and remove the structure.
- The heritage designation needed to be removed to allow for the issuance of a demolition permit.
- Conditions of the demolition permit included a salvage plan for any relevant heritage attributes.
-
January 28
Preston Springs has finished this stageCBO presented a report for Council outlining the significant concerns and structural issues at the property. Council voted to repeal the heritage designation for the Preston Springs Hotel property. This started a 30-day notice period for the public to file objections. Watch the Council meeting here.
-
February 2020
Preston Springs has finished this stageMHAC considered report from the CBO. MHAC passed a resolution indicating that the Preston Springs Hotel still has cultural heritage value.
-
April
Preston Springs has finished this stageAt a special Council meeting, Council referred an objection from the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario’s (ACO) Cambridge and North Dumfries branch to the province’s Conservation Review Board for a hearing and report.
-
November 3
Preston Springs has finished this stageCouncil met to discuss owner’s demolition application. Council was required to make a decision within 90 days of receiving the application.
- The Official Plan requires that Council to de-designate the property before any demolition can take place.
- Due to the process already underway with the CRB and the restrictions under the Official Plan, Council decided not to consent to the owner’s request to demolish.
-
December 24
Preston Springs has finished this stage- The Chief Building Official issued an Emergency Order to proceed with the demolition of the vacant building on Fountain Street to ensure public safety.
- Under Section 15.10 of the Building Code Act, an Emergency Order, where there is immediate danger, may be made and extends powers to the Chief Building Official to act independently of the City or Council. An emergency order supersedes heritage designations.
- The CBO described the property as a threat to public safety and cited the most recent engineering report which reiterated the structural concerns, as well as persistent and recurring security breaches.
Read the News Release
-
January 28, 2021
Preston Springs is currently at this stageCouncil meeting scheduled to discuss reports from staff focusing on an update from the Chief Building Official on events leading up to the order, and existing heritage protection and conservations practices including staff options to enhance and strengthen processes.
Categories
- Heritage Salvage Plan (1)
- History (2)